State v. Simmons
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 436
Syllabus
RECONSIDERATION – App.R. 26(A) second pro se application the record establishes this court neither made an obvious error nor misstated the record regarding a gun being used in Appellant's altercation with the victim upon consideration of his first application, Appellant did not demonstrate any obvious errors or raise any issues that were not adequately addressed in our previous opinion this court was not persuaded that we erred as a matter of law and we denied his first pro se application for reconsideration App.R. 26(A) does not provide for second or successive reconsiderations accordingly, Appellant's second pro se application for reconsideration is denied.
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.