Skip to main content

State v. Simmons

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 1828

Syllabus

Guilty pleas; breaking and entering; theft; criminal damaging or endangering; multiple cases; Crim.R. 11(C); Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(b); complied; prejudice; consecutive sentences; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); R.C. 2929.14(C)(4); multiple offenses; violated; community control; criminal history; findings; support. Affirmed the trial court's judgment in each of the cases appealed, including appellant's convictions and sentences, as well as the court's imposition of consecutive sentences between the five cases. The record demonstrated the trial court's compliance with Crim.R. 11(C), and appellant failed to demonstrate error under Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(b) or any prejudice in relation to his claimed error. The trial court made the requisite findings for imposing consecutive sentences pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(C)(4), and it could not be clearly and convincingly found that the evidence did not support the trial court's findings.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.