State v. Simkins
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4369
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by accepting appellant's plea of no contest. The court complied with Traf.R. 10 in accepting the plea. Appellant waived his right to counsel and was competent to plead. The court also did not err by overruling appellant's post-sentence motion to withdraw his plea. Appellant failed to show a manifest injustice supporting withdrawal. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., dissenting.)
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,645×
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 1,061×
- State v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court· 1976-03-31· cited 427×
- Alabama v. SheltonSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 330×
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 279×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2007-11-21· cited 185×
- State v. WatkinsOhio Supreme Court· 2003-05-16· cited 101×
- State v. BecraftOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-21· cited 30×
- State v. RuleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-10· cited 9×
- State v. ChipmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.