State v. Silva

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that “[o]ur constitution does not grant defendants the right to examine grand jury testimony”
• “for most intents and purposes, all [grand jury] proceedings should be legally sealed against divulgence” (quotation omitted)
• jury deadlock instruction was not coercive where court asked jury to use its best efforts to determine whether State met its burden because a mistrial would likely result in a retrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cobb
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-06-24· cited 50×
• State v. Alexander
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-12-23· cited 15×
• State v. Hodgdon
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-03-05· cited 10×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-03-18· cited 7×
• Small v. Warden, NHSP
  D. New Hampshire· 2006-11-28

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Booton
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-11-29· cited 46×
• State v. Fennelly
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-06-09· cited 27×
• State v. Erickson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-07-22· cited 22×
• State v. Glidden
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-03-24· cited 13×
• Opinion of the Justices
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1950-05-11· cited 12×
• State v. Giles
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-03-12· cited 11×
• State v. Simpson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1990-11-15· cited 9×
• State v. Jordan
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-11-05· cited 7×
• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-08-09· cited 7×