State v. Silva
Citations
- 118 La. 660
- 43 So. 269
- 1907 La. LEXIS 783
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Law — Remarks of Counsel Not Prejudicial to Defendant.</p> <p>A remark as made by the assistant district attorney, while examining a witness, not such as calculated to have bearing upon the cause, nor influence upon the jury.</p> <p>2. Same — New Trial — Surprise.</p> <p>No objection was timely made on the ground of surprise. It was too late to urge the objection on the application for a new trial. A party must be prompt to avert the consequence of surprise.</p> <p>TEd. Note. — Eor cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 15, Criminal Law, § 2304.]</p> <p>3. Same.</p> <p>Merely impeaching testimony is insufficient. (Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 15, Criminal Law, §§ 2331, 2332.] (Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FaheySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1883-01-15· cited 13×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1904-06-20· cited 10×
- State v. BrightSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1901-07-01· cited 6×
- State v. OffuttSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1886-04-15· cited 6×
- State v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1893-03-15· cited 6×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1878-02-15· cited 3×
- State v. HollierSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1897-03-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.