Skip to main content

State v. Silva

Citations

  • 118 La. 660
  • 43 So. 269
  • 1907 La. LEXIS 783

Syllabus

<p>1. Criminal Law — Remarks of Counsel Not Prejudicial to Defendant.</p> <p>A remark as made by the assistant district attorney, while examining a witness, not such as calculated to have bearing upon the cause, nor influence upon the jury.</p> <p>2. Same — New Trial — Surprise.</p> <p>No objection was timely made on the ground of surprise. It was too late to urge the objection on the application for a new trial. A party must be prompt to avert the consequence of surprise.</p> <p>TEd. Note. — Eor cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 15, Criminal Law, § 2304.]</p> <p>3. Same.</p> <p>Merely impeaching testimony is insufficient. (Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 15, Criminal Law, §§ 2331, 2332.] (Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.