State v. Silbernagel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was inappropriate to affirm on defendant’s proffered alternative basis for affirmance because the trial court did not address factual issues necessary to resolve that alternative basis
• “We need not consider whether the arresting officer in this case violated the implied consent laws, because, even assuming that he did, we agree with the state that ORS 136.432 precludes suppression of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).