Nebraska Supreme Court· 11/17/1976
State v. Siers
Citations
- 248 N.W.2d 1
- 197 Neb. 51
- 1976 Neb. LEXIS 687
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- intent as an essential issue and question of fact for the jury in an embezzlement trial
- language added to state uniform partnership act and Nebraska embezzlement statute allowed partner to be charged with theft of partnership property
- language added to state uniform partnership act and Nebraska embezzlement statute allowed partner to be charged with theft of partnership property
- Uniform Partnership Act’s legal entity theory of partnerships and statutory definition of embezzlement that includes property that is partly owned by another, permits a partner to be prosecuted for embezzlement from his partnership
- larceny statute that permits prosecution for co-owned property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Spencer, Boselaugh, Mocown, Newton, Clinton, Brodkey, McCown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-02-13· cited 120×
- State v. YbarraNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-05-02· cited 34×
- State v. DuisNebraska Supreme Court· 1981-01-30· cited 29×
- State v. GardSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-11-14· cited 17×
- State v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court· 1977-01-19· cited 17×
- Ravenna Bank v. Custom UnlimitedNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-08-01· cited 15×
- State v. MaysNebraska Supreme Court· 1979-05-22· cited 14×
- State v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-05-25· cited 14×
- People v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-12-02· cited 11×
- State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-06-05· cited 9×
- State v. ColeNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-03-03· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. GiordanoMassachusetts Superior Court· 2008-09-29
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Joseph Spatuzza and James CozzoSeventh Circuit· 1964-05-21· cited 47×
- Goldsberry v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1902-11-19· cited 47×
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-03-22· cited 44×
- Loker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-09-01· cited 37×
- Lyons v. DavorenSupreme Court· 1969-02-24· cited 31×
- People v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-03-09· cited 30×
- Kelley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1968-07-15· cited 25×
- GAYNOR v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1966-06-17· cited 24×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1900-11-12· cited 23×
- People v. BristowAppellate Court of Illinois· 1972-11-28· cited 20×
- State v. ReederNebraska Supreme Court· 1968-08-23· cited 19×
- Coffey v. County of HarlanSupreme Court· 1907-02-25· cited 18×
- State v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1967-06-30· cited 18×
- State of Oregon v. MonkOregon Supreme Court· 1951-12-19· cited 15×
- Helms v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1960-03-02· cited 15×
- Diebold v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1971-06-14· cited 14×
- Bell v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1954-12-28· cited 13×
- Hunt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1972-12-04· cited 13×
- Scarboro v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1950-11-14· cited 12×
- Adams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1966-06-30· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.