State v. Shumway
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 1227
Syllabus
The record establishes that the trial court complied with the requirements of Crim.R. 32.3 when it accepted appellant's admissions to violating his community control at the revocation hearing held on August 17, 2017. Trial court was not required to make inquiries pursuant to Crim.R. 11 prior to accepting appellant's admissions and revoking his community control. Appellant's argument that his sentence is contrary to law demonstrates that, at most, his sentence is voidable. Because appellant's sentence, assuming his argument had merit, would be voidable, he is barred by the doctrine of res judicata from challenging his sentence on that basis in the instant appeal. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.