Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/31/2020
State v. Shuck
Citations
- 166 N.E.3d 122
- 2020 Ohio 6989
Syllabus
Telecommunications harassment, R.C. 2917.21(A)(6), sufficiency of the evidence, manifest weight of the evidence, purpose, intent, abuse, threaten, harass, racial epithet, racial slur
Judges: Teodosio
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,379×
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 977×
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-11· cited 70×
- State v. CressOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-27· cited 55×
- State v. EllisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2008-10-10· cited 30×
- State v. KlingelOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-31· cited 11×
- State v. RasawehrOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-10· cited 11×
- In re C.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-20· cited 9×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-19· cited 3×
- State v. LoveOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.