State v. Shively

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under A.R.S. § 13-901.01(G), the court may make a 302 finding “only if it finds the probationer refused to participate in drug treatment, and may not do so based on a mere finding that he or she failed to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Vaughn
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-14· cited 22×
• State v. Moore
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-31· cited 15×
• Raney v. Lindberg
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-09-23· cited 11×