State v. Shine
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2916
Syllabus
Crim.R. 32.1/motion to withdraw plea res judicata request for transcript presumption of regularity postrelease control R.C. 2929.18(A)(3)(a)/imposition of fine. Only the portion of appellant's sentence where the trial court failed to impose statutorily mandated postrelease control is void thereby making appellant's motion to withdraw a postsentence motion. Appellant failed to demonstrate a manifest injustice. Under Crim.R. 11, appellant's plea of guilty was a complete admission of guilt. The state did not have to prove a mens rea component on the charges. The fines imposed were within the statutory limit. Appellant failed to file a direct appeal where all of his claims could have been raised. They are now barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court· 2000-08-03· cited 485×
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court· 2010-08-25· cited 337×
- State v. BoswellOhio Supreme Court· 2009-04-09· cited 111×
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 2009-08-04· cited 49×
- State v. ArringtonOhio Supreme Court· 1975-04-16· cited 41×
- State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-07-05· cited 27×
- State v. AlfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-22· cited 5×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.