Skip to main content

State v. Shine

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 2916

Syllabus

Crim.R. 32.1/motion to withdraw plea res judicata request for transcript presumption of regularity postrelease control R.C. 2929.18(A)(3)(a)/imposition of fine. Only the portion of appellant's sentence where the trial court failed to impose statutorily mandated postrelease control is void thereby making appellant's motion to withdraw a postsentence motion. Appellant failed to demonstrate a manifest injustice. Under Crim.R. 11, appellant's plea of guilty was a complete admission of guilt. The state did not have to prove a mens rea component on the charges. The fines imposed were within the statutory limit. Appellant failed to file a direct appeal where all of his claims could have been raised. They are now barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.