State v. Shilling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “a district court does not abuse its discretion in taxing private process server fees that do not exceed the statutory fees authorized in § 1921”
• explaining that, “while the employees received [only] economic remedies, the harm was not necessarily purely economic,” but also included violation of employees’ civil rights and “infliction of worry and emotional upset”
• upholding a $300,000 punitive damages award and a $36,257.13 compensatory damages award
• “admission [of deposition testimony] into evidence ... tends to show that it was necessarily obtained.”
• “We hold that private process server fees may be taxed pursuant to §§ 1920(1) and 1921.”
• “We hold that private process server fees may be taxed pursuant to §§ 1920(1) and 1921.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).