State v. Sherman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the purchaser-agent exemption is not applicable under the provisions of RCW 69.50.401(a) [the Uniform Controlled Substances Act]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-08-05· cited 20×
• State v. Matson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-12-06· cited 19×
• State v. Jubie
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1976-07-26· cited 14×
• State v. McGinley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-12-29· cited 12×
• State v. Casbeer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-20· cited 12×
• State v. Grace
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-07-08· cited 8×
• State v. Burden
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-12-12· cited 6×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Joseph W. Bailey, United States of America v. David Sloan
  D.C. Circuit· 1975-03-03· cited 28×
• United States v. Tony S. Hernandez, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Sergio T. Ramos
  Ninth Circuit· 1973-06-25· cited 22×
• State v. Catterall
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-07-12· cited 22×
• State v. Walker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1973-10-04· cited 22×
• United States v. Marquette Pierce
  D.C. Circuit· 1974-05-14· cited 15×
• United States v. Philip Marquez
  Tenth Circuit· 1975-02-10· cited 13×
• State v. Warnock
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-09-26· cited 10×