Hawaii Supreme Court· 4/10/1989
State v. Sherman
Citations
- 770 P.2d 789
- 70 Haw. 334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the prosecution is obliged, within a reasonable time, to make available the specifics required by [HRPP Rule 12.1(b) ]”
- noting that the “purpose of the rule was to provide reciprocal discovery between the prosecution and the defense,” (emphasis in original
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lum, C.J., and Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi and Wakatsuki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 364×
- State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court· 2000-04-06· cited 242×
- Paul's Electrical Service, Inc. v. BefitelHawaii Supreme Court· 2004-07-14· cited 85×
- Trivectra v. UshijimaHawaii Supreme Court· 2006-09-11· cited 51×
- State v. Valeros.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-01-27· cited 3×
- State v. AdachiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2010-04-27
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.