Skip to main content

State v. Sherman

Citations

  • 536 P.2d 1373
  • 217 Kan. 326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a reasonable period of time should be allowed for rescheduling of the defendant’s trial after the defendant’s failure to appear on the scheduled trial date, and that this period of delay should be charged to the defendant
  • stating that a reasonable period of time should be allowed for rescheduling of the defendant's trial after the defendant's failure to appear on the scheduled trial date, and that this period of delay should be charged to the defendant
  • interpreting Kan.Stat. Ann., § 22-3402 (1981)
  • interpreting Kan.Stat. Ann., § 22-3402 (1981)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaul, Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.