State v. Sherman

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 5354

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., appellant failed to show that the photo array police used was unduly suggestive, so trial court did not err by denying his motion to suppress. The state presented sufficient evidence that appellant was the perpetrator of the crimes to support his convictions, which was not affected by the circumstantial nature of the case. Appellant's convictions are not against the weight of the evidence because the trial court did not improperly stack inferences to convict him.