State v. Sheppard
Citations
- 64 Kan. 451
- 67 P. 870
- 1902 Kan. LEXIS 227
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Intoxicating Liquors — Possession as Prima Facie Evidence. It is within the constitutional power of the legislature to declare the possession of intoxicating liquor, except in a private dwelling unconnected with a place of business, by a person not legally authorized to sell such liquor, to be prima facie evidence of its possession for purposes of illegal sale.</p> <p>2. -Act of 1901 Held Valid. The title of chapter 232, Laws of 19Q1 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §§2193-2500), being “An act relating to the sale of intoxicating liquors, and the suppression of places where such liquors are sold or used or kept for sale or use contrary to law,” is sufficiently broad to include the subject of the legislative rule of evidence declared in section 8 of the act.</p>
Judges: Doster, Pollock, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HaremzaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-11-03· cited 46×
- State v. PotelloUtah Supreme Court· 1911-12-13· cited 43×
- State v. NossamanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-11-06· cited 28×
- State v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1911-06-01· cited 11×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1977-12-10· cited 10×
- Jones v. HickeySupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-05-08· cited 9×
- State v. LewisMontana Supreme Court· 1923-06-12· cited 4×
- Chapman v. BoyntonD. Kansas· 1933-05-13· cited 2×
- Estate of Ward v. State Department of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Kansas· 1954-07-06· cited 2×
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 1994-10-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.