State v. Sheppard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• single criminal objective where theft of specific car “was motivated by the same criminal objective as the trafficking: to provide the undercover officer with the specific car he ordered.”
• theft and trafficking offense committed on same occasion when defendant stole car and delivered it to undercover officer same day

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Arizona v. Richard Portugal Ortiz
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-10-16· cited 31×
• State v. Kelly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1997-12-31· cited 19×
• State v. Rasul
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-10-10· cited 19×
• State of Arizona v. Dominic Rodolpho Flores
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-10-10· cited 10×
• State of Arizona v. Mikal Omar Rasul
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-10-10
• State v. Blackwell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2026-05-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Noble
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-28· cited 70×
• State v. Perkins
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-05-02· cited 32×
• State v. Henry
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-03-04· cited 17×
• State v. Shulark
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-12-14· cited 8×
• State v. Sheppard
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-04-05· cited 4×