State v. Shepherd
Citations
- 63 Kan. 545
- 66 P. 236
- 1901 Kan. LEXIS 182
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Grand Larceny — Instruction as to Felonious Intent. When defendants tried upon a charge of grand larceny admit the taking, but defend on the ground that the taking was in jest, and with the intent to return the property presently to the owner, and the property so taken is returned to the owner, they are entitled to a charge from the court' defining the term “felonious intent,” as used in connection with larceny.</p> <p>2. - “Felonious Intent'’ Defined. The term felonious intent, as used in relation to larceny, “means to deprive the owner, not temporarily, but permanently, of his property, without color of right or lawful excuse for the act, and to convert it to the taker’s use without the consent of the owner.” (In re Mutchler, Petitioner, 55 Kan. 164, 40 Pac. 283.)</p>
Judges: Cunningham, Pollock, Poster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ClingermanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-12-08· cited 31×
- Guffey v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1921-05-07· cited 17×
- State v. GoldsberrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1945-07-07· cited 12×
- Impson v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1936-06-08· cited 6×
- State v. McConnellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-07-09· cited 2×
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Day ex rel. DaySupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-03-12· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.