State v. Shepard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that as the finder of fact the jury was free to credit defendant’s testimony about post-driving alcohol consumption, but was not obliged to do so
• noting “intoxication is a ‘common reason’ people leave the scene of accidents” and “[p]resumably, if the drinking had occurred after the accident, [the driver] would have said so since that fact obviously would have helped . . . .” (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Horning
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-07-28· cited 15×
• State v. Ards
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-07-16· cited 10×
• Reeves v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-06-24· cited 8×
• State of Minnesota v. Gregory Allen Olson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-12-05· cited 7×
• State v. Bashaw
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-04-25· cited 4×
• State v. MOHOMOUD
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-09-14

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Storvick
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-08-05· cited 49×
• Eggersgluss v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-09-19· cited 25×
• State, City of Eagan v. Elmourabit
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-08-23· cited 18×
• State v. Larson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-09-27· cited 7×
• State v. Stark
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-22· cited 7×
• State v. Shepard
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-07-02· cited 1×