Skip to main content
· 1/24/2012

State v. SHELMIDINE

Citations

  • 269 P.3d 362
  • 166 Wash. App. 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim because “defense counsel could competently and diligently represent Shelmidine in compliance with the RPCs”
  • rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim because \defense counsel could competently and diligently represent Shelmidine in compliance with the RPCs\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Penoyar, Van Deren Worswick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.