· 1/24/2012
State v. SHELMIDINE
Citations
- 269 P.3d 362
- 166 Wash. App. 107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim because “defense counsel could competently and diligently represent Shelmidine in compliance with the RPCs”
- rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim because \defense counsel could competently and diligently represent Shelmidine in compliance with the RPCs\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Penoyar, Van Deren Worswick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.