Skip to main content

State v. Shelley

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1528

Syllabus

Reagan Tokes Act consecutive sentences effective assistance of counsel. The trial court did not err in ordering the sentences to be served consecutively when the findings were supported by the record. Indeterminate sentence imposed pursuant to Reagan Tokes Act did not violate the defendant's right to a trial by jury, the separation of powers doctrine, or the right to due process. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the indeterminate sentence.

Judges: Willamowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.