State v. Shelley
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1528
Syllabus
Reagan Tokes Act consecutive sentences effective assistance of counsel. The trial court did not err in ordering the sentences to be served consecutively when the findings were supported by the record. Indeterminate sentence imposed pursuant to Reagan Tokes Act did not violate the defendant's right to a trial by jury, the separation of powers doctrine, or the right to due process. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the indeterminate sentence.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court· 1976-12-27· cited 1,190×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
- State v. HesterOhio Supreme Court· 1976-02-04· cited 344×
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
- United States v. MorianiSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 279×
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-20· cited 73×
- State v. BallOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-09· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.