State v. Sheiner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding evidence was sufficient to support termination of mother’s parental rights and discussing evidence of mother’s continuing failure to obtain employment
• holding the standards applicable to dependency and termination cases are the same
• acknowledging the precedential value of In re S.M., 614 A.2d 312 (Pa.Super. 1992) while questioning “under what authority our Court announced a new and heightened standard of review” as to ineffectiveness in dependency proceedings.
• “The goal change from reunification to adoption, under any relevant analysis, is clearly and convincingly supported by evidence of record.”
• “The appellant must - 18 - J-A27007-15 show by clear and convincing evidence that it is more likely than not that the result would have been different, absent the ineffectiveness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).