Skip to main content

State v. Sheckles

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 3339

Syllabus

Criminal law—Touhy regulations do not create rights for criminal defendants, and a violation of such regulations is not generally a basis for a criminal defendant to request an exclusionary remedy—Touhy regulations are not rules of procedural admissibility to be wielded by a criminal defendant to exclude testimony of a current or former federal employee—Court of appeals' judgment reversed and cause remanded to trial court.

Judges: Brunner, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.