State v. Shearod

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The existence of contradictory, conflicting testimony or evidence ‘does not warrant a judgment of acquittal because the weight of the evidence and the witnesses' credibility are questions solely for the jury.’”
• “The State met its threshold burden of producing evidence on every element of the crime charged, overcoming the motion for judgment of acquittal and permitting the questions of credibility to be resolved by the jury.”
• “The State met its threshold burden of producing evidence on every element of the crime charged, overcoming the motion for judgment of acquittal and permitting the questions of credibility to be resolved by the jury.”
• “The existence of contradictory, conflicting testimony or evidence ‘does not warrant a judgment of acquittal because the weight of the evidence and the witnesses’ credibility are questions solely for the jury.’” (quoting Fitzpatrick v. State, 900 So.2d 495, 508 (Fla. 2005)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).