Missouri Court of Appeals· 2/20/1996
State v. Shaw
Citations
- 915 S.W.2d 775
- 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 253
- 1996 WL 69344
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence of forged checks, other than those which were the subject of the prosecution, were properly admitted as part of a common plan or scheme to defraud
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breckenridge, Ulrich, Stith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MerrillMissouri Court of Appeals· 1999-03-23· cited 21×
- State v. DunsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-11-17· cited 18×
- State v. SimsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-08-05· cited 15×
- State v. HarpMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-04-09· cited 6×
- State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-02-18· cited 6×
- State v. KnowlesMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-06-10· cited 6×
- State v. McCraryMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-01-20· cited 6×
- State v. WilderMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-06-03· cited 5×
- State v. ApelMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-02-22· cited 4×
- State v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-09-12· cited 4×
- State of Missouri v. Morris Edwin MillerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2020-02-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.