Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/18/1981
State v. Shaw
Citations
- 185 Conn. 372
- 441 A.2d 561
- 1981 Conn. LEXIS 617
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that most jurisdictions have adopted the rule that there is no duty of retreat with cohabitants and unlawful intruders
- second statement substantially same as lost statement; full opportunity to cross-examine witness; officer testifying on contents of witness’ lost statement
- loss of tape not reversible error because unavailability of tape unintentional and prejudice slight
- prior conviction for manslaughter admissible in assault prosecution with limiting instruction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bogdanski, Speziale, Peters, Healey, Armentano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-07-13· cited 114×
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-25· cited 108×
- State v. GeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-24· cited 103×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-04-13· cited 101×
- State v. CorchadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-12-14· cited 92×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-13· cited 86×
- State v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-22· cited 82×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-07-26· cited 81×
- State v. MilumSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-11-19· cited 77×
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-09-04· cited 75×
- State v. VessichioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-11-26· cited 61×
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-01-19· cited 60×
- State v. HameleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-09-14· cited 58×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-06-26· cited 58×
- State v. SilveiraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-01-28· cited 56×
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-05-28· cited 54×
- Weiand v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-03-11· cited 53×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-03-06· cited 53×
- State v. Anonymous (83-FG)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-07-26· cited 52×
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-28· cited 52×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ChetcutiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-06-07· cited 121×
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-02· cited 117×
- State v. BittingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-11-23· cited 116×
- Kennebec Log Driving Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 114×
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-19· cited 95×
- United States v. Econuel Perry, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1972-10-20· cited 92×
- United States v. MirandaSecond Circuit· 1975-12-03· cited 90×
- Heating Acceptance Corporation v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1965-03-04· cited 72×
- State v. MarquezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-11-10· cited 69×
- State v. HardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-06-27· cited 68×
- United States v. Bobby J. HerndonFifth Circuit· 1976-08-06· cited 55×
- People v. LenkevichMichigan Supreme Court· 1975-05-27· cited 55×
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-02-04· cited 54×
- Consolidated Diesel Electric Corp. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-01-16· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-01-02· cited 33×
- Daggett v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1821-07-15· cited 33×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-07-01· cited 29×
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-07-26· cited 26×
- State v. CataudellaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-06-29· cited 26×
- Oney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1928-09-28· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.