Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 9/13/1989
State v. Shanks
Citations
- 448 N.W.2d 264
- 152 Wis. 2d 284
- 1989 Wisc. App. LEXIS 902
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[h]asty entry” of a plea or “confusion on the defendant’s part” can be grounds for plea withdrawal under the lower “fair and just reasons” standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Scott, Parins, Reserve
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court· 2000-02-04· cited 125×
- State v. LeitnerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2001-07-12· cited 35×
- Duncil v. KaufmanWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-06-12· cited 31×
- State v. Tyrus Lee CooperWisconsin Supreme Court· 2019-06-20· cited 25×
- State v. ShimekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1999-09-30· cited 10×
- State v. BolligCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1999-01-28· cited 7×
- Estate of Burgess v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1997-10-14· cited 4×
- State v. SheahanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-09-30
- State v. RickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2018-11-13
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. BarkerD.C. Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 279×
- United States v. Roberto Navarro-FloresNinth Circuit· 1980-04-11· cited 68×
- Libke v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-06-29· cited 42×
- Dudrey v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 26×
- State v. McConnohieWisconsin Supreme Court· 1984-11-27· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.