State v. Shaheen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the unexplained possession of recently stolen property is sufficient to support a conviction for theft
• “Although there is no direct physical evidence linking the defendant to the crimes[,] the finder of fact has the right to infer guilt of theft from the unexplained possession of recently stolen goods.”
• “unexplained possession of recently stolen property is not only sufficient to support theft conviction, but when burglary necessarily occurs as adjunct, inference of guilt from unexplained possession of recently stolen goods also supports conviction for burglary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).