Skip to main content

State v. Sexton

Citations

  • 724 S.W.2d 371
  • 1986 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 2686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that absent proof that detective changed testimony after hearing other witnesses, failure to testify first did not affect the results
  • holding that “[w]hile it would have been the better practice for the prosecuting witness . . . to have testified first, such failure to do so did not substantially injure the plaintiff”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dwyer, O'Brien, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.