State v. Sensenig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding witness not accomplice as matter of law because there was no evidence of “active participation attributed to the witness,” although “it could be inferred witness knew what was going on”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Randles
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-01-16· cited 44×
• State v. Brooks
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-12-07· cited 40×
• State v. Swenor
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-11-18· cited 30×
• State v. Evans
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1981-05-28· cited 7×
• State v. Boetger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-02-20· cited 6×
• State v. Colpitts
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2022-03-29

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gonzales
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-03-25· cited 61×
• State v. Brake
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1921-02-15· cited 58×
• State v. Bassett
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1963-08-09· cited 42×
• State v. Altwatter
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1916-05-09· cited 36×
• State v. Wilson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1969-07-23· cited 34×
• State v. Proud
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1953-11-17· cited 24×
• State v. Grant
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1914-06-18· cited 18×
• State v. Emmons
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1972-03-21· cited 17×
• State v. McCandless
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1950-09-13· cited 12×
• Haggerty v. Western Barge, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1971-12-22· cited 11×