Skip to main content
· 12/30/1988

State v. Seguritan

Citations

  • 766 P.2d 128
  • 70 Haw. 173
  • 1988 Haw. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the circuit court erred in instructing the jury on the definition of EMED because the circuit court used language not found in the statute
  • holding that the circuit court erred in instructing the jury on the definition of EMED because the circuit court used language not found in the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.