State v. Seefeldt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that embezzlement requires that the property be “fraudulently appropriated by the person to whom it has been intrusted (sic).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re William Wallace, Debtor. Mark Klemens v. William Wallace
  Tenth Circuit· 1988-02-29· cited 156×
• State v. Ortiz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-04-05· cited 55×
• State v. Peke
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-03-01· cited 30×
• State v. Hornbeck
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-01-17· cited 19×
• Klemens v. Wallace
  D. New Mexico· 1986-03-06· cited 7×
• State v. Cramer
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-01-25· cited 5×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Prince
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1948-01-07· cited 66×