State v. Sebecca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there would be no occasion for the officer in his role as witness to describe the defendant to himself in his role as investigator
• teaching of Howe is that police must not be permitted to unduly suggest who perpetrator is when identification is a key to State’s case
• “Officer Casale could not be found through the photo identification process to have impermissibly suggested to himself the [identity of the suspect].”
• “[Manson] is clearly distinguishable from this case because the suggestive photo identification procedure was employed by a second regular officer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).