Missouri Court of Appeals· 3/26/2013
State v. Seay
Citations
- 395 S.W.3d 64
- 2013 WL 1197489
- 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 373
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence for a conviction under § 544.665 was truly a question of statutory interpretation because it required the court to determine the scope of the statute’s application
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hardwick, Mitchell, Newton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.