Skip to main content

State v. Seay

Citations

  • 395 S.W.3d 64
  • 2013 WL 1197489
  • 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence for a conviction under § 544.665 was truly a question of statutory interpretation because it required the court to determine the scope of the statute’s application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardwick, Mitchell, Newton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.