State v. Seavey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting 2 Officer Wrigley argues that Mr. Ismail brings his motion under 29-A M.R.S. § 2071(2)(A), whereas Officer Wrigley stated he initiated the traffic stop pursuant to 29-A M.R.S. § 2071(2)(B). Wrigley’s Obj. at 4 (citing Wrigley’s Summ. J. Mot. at 9

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Burkley
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-01-15· cited 60×
• State v. Webber
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-10-03· cited 12×
• State of Arizona v. Michael Anthony Salcido
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-11-16· cited 9×