State v. Seaton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that trial court did not follow prosecutor’s erroneous recommendation; court properly made sentences on sex crimes consecutive after expressing desire to impose the maximum sentence
• finding no error occurred when the prosecutor's recommendation implied consecutive sentencing was required in that the circuit court's comments during sentencing established the court did not believe the state's recommendation was mandatory as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pierce
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2018-06-12· cited 29×
• State v. Scott
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-31· cited 21×
• STATE OF MISSOURI v. JEREMIAH ELAM
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-06-28· cited 8×
• State v. Barbee
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-12-17· cited 5×
• Parker v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-01-28· cited 5×
• State v. Wade
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-03-10· cited 3×
• State of Missouri v. Bryan M. Pierce
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-10-18

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wheat
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1989-08-21· cited 104×
• State v. Burgess
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1990-12-18· cited 49×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1990-12-18· cited 37×
• Adams v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-03-26· cited 14×
• State v. Murphy
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-06-07· cited 13×
• State v. Wallace
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-12-22· cited 6×