State v. Searls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “During voir dire, the [s]tate may mention the defendant’s 18 constitutional privilege against self-incrimination to the jurors, and then inquire into 19 the weight jurors will give to the defendant’s testimony if he decides to testify.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Alridge
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2018-05-23· cited 22×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cordero
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2008-10-31· cited 1,034×
• Canovsky v. Gehrsen
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1927-11-28· cited 591×
• Shea v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 233×
• State v. Shea
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-10-18· cited 42×
• State v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-02-21· cited 41×
• State v. Shed
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2002-09-18· cited 16×
• State v. Packnett
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-12-28· cited 12×
• State v. Searls
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2005-01-25· cited 11×
• State ex rel. Shed v. State
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2003-12-19· cited 1×