State v. Seaman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing divergent approaches and finding that applying a rebuttable presumption “gives more appropriate recognition to the interests of both parties because it permits consideration of the facts in each unique matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Janiec
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1952-06-30· cited 11×
• State v. Clark
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-05-31· cited 9×
• State v. Dancyger
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-07-03· cited 8×
• In Re Wilmington Hospitality LLC
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-01-10· cited 5×
• State v. Hogan
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1952-05-19· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1899-05-06· cited 62×
• State v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1910-03-04· cited 7×
• Engeman v. State
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1892-02-15· cited 5×
• State v. Meola
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1950-01-20· cited 4×
• State v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1910-11-15· cited 4×
• State v. Craig
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1950-07-10· cited 3×
• State v. Spence
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1911-06-14· cited 1×