State v. Scudder
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1267
Syllabus
NO-CONTEST PLEA — OVI — WAIVER — R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(j)(ix) — EXPLANATION OF CIRCUMSTANCES – R.C. 2937.07: The trial court erred in finding defendant guilty of operating a motor vehicle with a specific concentration of methamphetamine in his urine following a no-contest plea to R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(j)(ix) where the State's explanation of circumstances did not identify the substance or its amount that was present in defendant's system, either expressly or by implication. Defendant did not explicitly and clearly waive the explanation-of-circumstances requirement under R.C. 2937.07 by indicating that he did not want to hear the facts following his no-contest plea.
Judges: Kinsley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BowersOhio Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 155×
- Girard v. Giordano (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-18· cited 47×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-27· cited 12×
- City of Seven Hills v. McKernanCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2019-03-21· cited 7×
- State v. HaskampOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-10· cited 3×
- State v. HindsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.