State v. Schwartz
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1424
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction for obstructing official business was supported by sufficient evidence where the state presented testimony and evidence from which the jury could have found all the essential elements of the offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Contrary to his arguments otherwise, appellant's actions demonstrated he acted with purpose to obstruct or delay law enforcement from the performance of official duties.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.