Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 6/26/2000
State v. Schwartz
Citations
- 615 N.W.2d 85
- 2000 Minn. App. LEXIS 673
- 2000 WL 871191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “parole revocation is not within the district court’s original jurisdiction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Halbrooks, Harten, Willis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 156×
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-01-22· cited 84×
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-01-28· cited 69×
- Bailey v. GardebringEighth Circuit· 1991-07-26· cited 65×
- Irwin v. Surdyk's LiquorSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-09-02· cited 30×
- Northwest v. LaFleurCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-09-08· cited 14×
- Vicker v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-05-29· cited 11×
- State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-07-20· cited 3×
- State ex rel. Jaffa v. CrepeauSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-09-30· cited 3×
- State ex rel. Fox v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-06-23· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.