North Dakota Supreme Court· 4/20/2001
State v. Schwarm
Citations
- 271 Kan. 155
- 21 P.3d 990
- 2001 Kan. LEXIS 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admissibility of expert testimony lies within sound discretion of trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Wahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HodgesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-03-28· cited 63×
- United States v. Roy A. BarteeTenth Circuit· 1973-06-14· cited 52×
- United States v. Timothy Alden HayesFifth Circuit· 1979-05-17· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. CominsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-10-18· cited 31×
- State v. NaramoreCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-07-24· cited 22×
- United States v. Shiva N. VarmaTenth Circuit· 1982-10-12· cited 20×
- People v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-06-02· cited 18×
- State v. StukeySupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-12-11· cited 13×
- State v. VakasSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-10-30· cited 11×
- In Re VanderblomenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-04-17· cited 8×
- United States v. Austin L. Jamieson, D.O.Tenth Circuit· 1986-11-26· cited 7×
- Sloman v. Board of Pharmacy ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa· 1989-05-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.