State v. Schutte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] qualifying statement need not be a confession to a crime” but must “tend” to subject the declarant to criminal liability.
• statements against penal interest under OEC 804(3)(c) need not be confessions to a crime, but must simply “tend” to subject the declarant to criminal liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wood v. Baldwin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-01-13· cited 18×
• State v. Ventris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-24· cited 12×
• State v. Edwards-Peecher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-05· cited 3×
• State v. Anthony
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-01-05· cited 1×
• State v. Moon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-08-14

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reynoldson v. Jackson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-07-29· cited 8×
• State v. Jacob
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-01-05· cited 1×