State v. Schurman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• outlining the required standard of proof to sustain a jury verdict on a sufficiency of the evidence claim
• “[T]he circumstances must be entirely consistent with defendant’s guilt, [and] wholly inconsistent with any rational hypothesis of his, innocence.... ”
• “[T]he circumstances must be entirely consistent with defendant’s guilt, [and] wholly inconsistent with any rational hypothesis of his innocence . . . .”
• “[T]he circumstances must be entirely consistent with defendant’s guilt, [and] wholly inconsistent with any rational hypothesis of his innocence . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).