State v. Schumacher

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 2478

Syllabus

The trial court did not commit plain error by failing to notify appellant of the exact number of days appellant was entitled to receive at his sentencing hearing as required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(g)(i) where appellant could not establish any resulting prejudice given the trial court's inclusion of the specific number of days of jail-time credit appellant was to receive as part of its sentencing entry. Additionally, the trial court did not completely fail to comply with the requirements of Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) when it misinformed appellant as to the full extent of his postrelease control obligations upon appellant's release from prison, thereby requiring appellant to demonstrate prejudice, something that appellant did not do as part of his appellate brief.