State v. Schultzen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing a full closure from a “quasi closure” and applying the Waller test to conclude the quasi-closure at issue was both no broader than necessary to protect the identified overriding interest and a reasonable alternative to entirely closing the proceeding to the public
• distinguishing a full closure from a “quasi closure” and applying the Waller test to conclude the quasi-closure at issue was both no broader than necessary to protect the identified overriding interest and a reasonable alternative to entirely closing the proceeding to the public
• public trial right not violated by reasonable alternative to closure, or “quasi-closure,” that entailed having three spectators (members of defendant’s family
• public trial right not violated by reasonable alternative to closure, or “quasi-closure,” that entailed having three spectators (members of defendant’s family

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).