Skip to main content
· 12/29/1980

State v. Schofill

Citations

  • 621 P.2d 364
  • 63 Haw. 77
  • 1980 Haw. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a police officer not able to render an opinion that a “substance was in fact cocaine,” still possessed the expertise “to state that the substance ‘appeared to be cocaine’ ”
  • police officer allowed to testify that what defendant gave him “appeared to be cocaine” because the officer had taken courses on drugs and cocaine, had purchased cocaine before and was familiar with its appearance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Ogata, Menor, Lum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.