· 12/29/1980
State v. Schofill
Citations
- 621 P.2d 364
- 63 Haw. 77
- 1980 Haw. LEXIS 219
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a police officer not able to render an opinion that a “substance was in fact cocaine,” still possessed the expertise “to state that the substance ‘appeared to be cocaine’ ”
- police officer allowed to testify that what defendant gave him “appeared to be cocaine” because the officer had taken courses on drugs and cocaine, had purchased cocaine before and was familiar with its appearance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Ogata, Menor, Lum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.