State v. Schoen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a defendant who is charged with “tampering]” with property cannot be found guilty of “interfering” with property, when those words provided alternative definitions of the same criminal act
• ORS 164.345(2) “does not simply criminalize all acts done with [the intent to cause substantial inconvenience]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Baker-Krofft
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-08-19· cited 23×
• State v. Hendricks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-19· cited 23×
• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-22· cited 1×
• State of Missouri v. Harley J. Ahart, Jr.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-10-20

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• State v. Stevens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-12-17· cited 60×
• State v. Briney
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-12-31· cited 20×
• State v. Schoen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01· cited 2×