State v. Schnabel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[n]either [child] was of a tender age, nor can one say that their ages in today’s world of movies, sexual education, television, the world-wide web, and magazines were such that either child would not possess knowledge of the acts they described when they first described them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. J.L.G.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2018-07-31· cited 124×
• State v. Bobby Perry A/K/A Bobby Penny(075114)
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2016-05-17· cited 108×
• State v. J.R.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-01-09· cited 85×
• State v. P.S.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-06-07· cited 84×
• State v. J.A.C.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-06-14· cited 80×
• State v. J.D.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-08-09· cited 35×
• W.R.C. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-10-01· cited 4×
• Desrosiers v. Diageo North America, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-08-14· cited 4×
• State v. JAC
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-06-14· cited 1×
• State v. PS
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-06-07
• State v. J.R. (076694)
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-01-09
• Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Gary Campbell
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2025-07-25